| READ MAIN PAGE | RSS Feed | RSS Comments | Log in | |
|
Warned about during February 2007
Everyone will have heard about Julie Amero, the small-town substitute teacher, who got convicted in court for exposing seventh-grade students to pornographic material on her classroom computer. Computer expert W. Herbert Horner testified for the defense that the images were the result of incessant pop-up ads served by spyware on the classroom computer. Because the license on Web-filtering software at her school had lapsed, according to published reports. As a result, pop-ups that appeared on the classroom PC also included pornographic images. So, evidently, if this happens to you because the school has been neglecting their updates then you can get convicted and face 40 years in jail, just like Julie Amero. We are keeping track of this story and its details.
|
Security Warning Resources
Other World Wide Warnings
Aspartame : Artificial sweetener or poison? Big Brother : Who is really watching us? Big Pharma: Pain, pills and scandals Debt : All about credit, debt, and banking Global Warming : Science or scam? GMO : Genetic Manipulation and engineering Goji Juice : Another Pyramid Scam? ID Theft : A Modern Epidemic Jobs : Where is yours and where is it going? Malpractice : Mistakes or crimes? Mangosteen/Xango : A cure-all scam? Noni Juice : Pyramid scheme, an MLM cure? RFID : Electronically invading your privacy Security : In the digital age Splenda : Sucralose sweetener or poison? Thimerosal : The mercury based preservative |
If you have verifiable information or a warning you would like to see added to this web-site then please contact our team at
World Wide Warning and its affiliates have no responsibility for the views, opinions and information communicated here. The contributor(s) and news providers
are fully responsible for this content. In addition, the views and opinions expressed here are not necessarily those of World Wide Warning or its affiliates.
Fair Use Notice: This site may contain copyrighted (C) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner.
Such material is made available for educational purposes, to advance understanding of human rights, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc.
It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in the 'fair use doctrine'. It is distributed without profit.
